How to Share Campaign Information Without Adding an Unverified Claim
Sharing a page can make its published information more visible, but it does not make the person sharing it a witness to an activity or a verifier of the entire campaign. When preparing a summary, identify the information's source and preserve the difference between the organizer's statements and what remains unverified. Convey a specific description without adding an experience or guarantee you do not have.
Say what you know and how you know it
Start with the original link. If your knowledge comes from reading the page, describe it that way. Do not add a personal experience that never happened or wording suggesting independent review. You can state that the summary relies on information visible when you read it. This explains the scope of your reading without guaranteeing implementation. Ask whether each sentence reports what you read or adds a conclusion absent from the page.
Preserve the activity's status
Check the verbs before publishing your summary. A plan remains a plan, and an announced purchase does not become a completed distribution. Preserve images' context rather than using an image as evidence of another event. If information is missing from the source, do not fill the gap with an emotional detail or a personal inference presented as fact. A short attributed statement may be more accurate than a longer explanation that exceeds the available information.
Use a clear structure
A sharing caption can include the original link, a description attributed to the organizer, information available to review and a point that remains unclear. It need not add trust labels, promised benefits or pressure on readers. Keep each element brief enough that the limits of your knowledge remain visible. This is a suggested editorial framework, not an independent testimonial or outside endorsement.
An expressly fictional example: an imaginary campaign announces preparations for an activity and links to its updates. A summary can say the organizer published that plan and the link provides information about its status. It should not add that the activity finished. This recounts no real event and endorses no completed FundGaza campaign.
Correct the summary when information changes
If the original page publishes a clarification, review what you shared. Add the new reference and explain the corrected point. If the earlier message cannot be edited, a later clarification can connect readers to the source without repeating the mistaken conclusion. Avoid republishing personal details unnecessary to explain the correction. Careful presentation preserves provenance, scope and uncertainty without replacing verification.
Further reading
ICRC ·
Frequently asked questions
Should I call a campaign trustworthy because I like its presentation?
Liking the presentation is not verification of a campaign. Describe what you read and its source without turning an impression into a guarantee or endorsement.
How should I share a plan that has not been completed?
Identify it as the organizer's announced plan and link to the available information about its status. Do not assume implementation or promise an outcome the source does not establish.